A physicist at the University of California, James Scargill, has recently calculated that life really could exist in a 2D universe. Wanting to test the anthropic principle that universes can’t exist if there is no life within to observe them, Scargill examined the ideal of life in ‘2+1 dimensions’, where +1 represented the dimension of time.
His paper suggests that ‘there are two main arguments levelled against the possibility of life in 2+1 dimensions: the lack of local gravitational force and Newtonian limit in 3D general relativity, and the claim that the restriction to a planar topology means that the possibilities are “too simply” for life to exist’. The conclusions of his findings have significant implications both for the physics and the philosophy of living outside the ‘3+1 dimensions’ which humans are used to.
Scargill hypothesises that, theoretically, a scalar gravitational field could exist in two dimensions, allowing for gravity and hence cosmology in a 2D universe. For life to emerge, there must be a certain level of complexity, ‘which in this case can be symbolised with neural networks’. Because our highly complex brains exist in 3D, we might initially think a neural network couldn't work in only two dimensions. However, Scargill demonstrates that ‘certain types of planar, two-dimensional graphs share properties with biological neural networks we find in life’. Additionally, such graphs can also be combined in ways resembling the modular function of neural networks, even exhibiting ‘small-world properties’, where a complex network can be crossed in a small number of steps. Therefore, this suggests that such types of universes could support life.
Upon assessing Scargill’s proposition, the MIT Technology Review said: ‘Physicists and philosophers have long claimed that life can form only in a universe like ours, with three dimensions of space and one of time. That thinking may need to be revised’.
Students interested in applying for Physics or Philosophy can further explore this newly put forth theory and its conclusions, speculating on the constructs of space and time and the implications of such a hypothesis.
***Please note that this is the latest information regarding admissions tests from Oxford University as of January 2026. If more updates are released, we will endeavour to update our blog as soon as possible.*** Update on Oxford University Admissions Tests This week Oxford University have announced that, from 2026,…
It’s January and thousands of Oxford and Cambridge applicants have either just found out or are soon to find out whether they are being offered a place to study at Oxford or Cambridge. However, as is inevitable, the majority of very promising applicants will unfortunately receive the news that they…
How Early Should I Start Thinking about Applying to Oxbridge? You may not have reached your year of application, or even A-levels, or even GCSEs, but you think you might want to go to either Oxford or Cambridge when the time eventually comes around. The question that might now be…
When are Oxford and Cambridge Offers Released? Oxford offers will be released on Tuesday the 13th of January 2026. Both successful and unsuccessful applicants will be notified by the university of their decision. Applicants will also be able to see the results of their application on the UCAS online portal.…
Why It Pays to Start Early on Your University Application Applying to universities, especially renowned institutions like Oxford and Cambridge, can be a daunting and highly competitive process. However, as we have learned from our almost 25 years of experience helping students with their applications, with careful planning and starting…
We offer competitive pay, flexible work and the chance to inspire students and make a difference to their lives. If you’re interested, click below to apply.